Football ELO rankings

MLS team ELO ranking

Compare MLS clubs using their latest reliably observed ELO. Recent form adds short-term context without replacing baseline team strength.

Data updated on

Explore leagues and seasons

Interactive statistics load in your browser.

Connecting to league data.

MLS team ELO ranking

Season : 2026 · Latest observation : 2026-09-28

ELO leaderPhiladelphia Union
Average ELO1498
ELO spread348
Teams covered30

Rank teams by

Rank teams by
RankTeamCurrent ELOMatchesRecent form
1Philadelphia Union166227
2Nashville SC163927
3Charlotte FC163227
4St. Louis CITY SC160126
5New England Revolution159526
6Vancouver Whitecaps FC158726
7FC Dallas158527
8Inter Miami CF157527
9Houston Dynamo FC156127
10Orlando City SC154727
11Chicago Fire FC152826
12Los Angeles FC151928
13FC Cincinnati151726
14Austin FC151027
15Toronto FC149327
16San Diego FC148427
17New York City FC147827
18San Jose Earthquakes147527
19Portland Timbers147127
20Los Angeles Galaxy146728
21Seattle Sounders FC145726
22Colorado Rapids144927
23Minnesota United FC144627
24Columbus Crew143127
25Atlanta United FC141027
26D.C. United139326
27Red Bull New York139224
28Real Salt Lake City137727
29Sporting Kansas City134726
30CF Montréal131426

The ranking uses the latest reliable ELO available for every team in the selected squad. Recent form and the league table use only results from the displayed season.

ELO change is not shown because a consistent variation history is not available across every competition.

RankTeamMatchesWDLGDPts
1Nashville SC2718633460
2Vancouver Whitecaps FC2615563350
3FC Dallas271386847
4Inter Miami CF27121051446
5New England Revolution2614481046
6San Jose Earthquakes2713681045
7St. Louis CITY SC261286944
8Houston Dynamo FC271359244
9Charlotte FC271278943
10Chicago Fire FC261268842
11Los Angeles FC2811891341
12Philadelphia Union27116101039
13Colorado Rapids2711313036
14Los Angeles Galaxy289910-736
15Seattle Sounders FC26989-135
16Orlando City SC2710413-1634
17New York City FC278910533
18FC Cincinnati26899-933
19San Diego FC278811032
20Portland Timbers279513-332
21Real Salt Lake City279513-432
22Austin FC2771010-1231
23D.C. United266128-830
24Red Bull New York248610-1230
25Columbus Crew278514-429
26Minnesota United FC277812-929
27Toronto FC2761110-1229
28Atlanta United FC277614-1327
29CF Montréal265615-2321
30Sporting Kansas City266317-3221

The league table is calculated from available results (three points for a win and one for a draw), with goal difference as the first tiebreaker.

Reading

How to read the ELO ranking

ELO estimates relative team strength using results and opponent strength. It reflects a structural level, while recent form covers a much shorter run of matches. Values update as new match data becomes available.

Method

MLS statistics: quick league reading

This page helps you read MLS through several complementary angles: ELO hierarchy, recent form, match volume, home/away split and overall season structure. MLS combines travel, rotating form and a specific seasonal setup, which increases the value of a reliable macro view. The goal is not to show a raw table only, but to turn league data into actionable context for result pages, daily match reading and AI football prediction pages.

  • Read the league hierarchy: identify the strongest clubs in the selected season.
  • Compare teams: combine ELO with recent form and match sample to separate baseline strength from short-term momentum.
  • Interpret MLS better: home/away profile and goals volume add context beyond rank alone.
  • Next step: connect this page with the MLS hub, including results and fixtures, and the team pages.
FAQ

MLS ELO FAQ

How do I read the MLS ELO ranking?

Select a season and read the team table directly. ELO helps compare relative team strength across the league.

Why combine ELO with recent form in MLS?

ELO gives structural context, while short-term form helps interpret whether momentum supports or contradicts that baseline.

Where can I connect this ranking to match-level results?

Use the MLS hub to relate ELO, fixtures, results and historical reliability.