Football ELO rankings
Chinese Super League team ELO ranking
Compare Chinese Super League clubs using their latest reliably observed ELO. Recent form adds short-term context without replacing baseline team strength.
Data updated on
Compare Chinese Super League clubs using their latest reliably observed ELO. Recent form adds short-term context without replacing baseline team strength.
Data updated on
Interactive statistics load in your browser.
Connecting to league data.
Rank teams by
| Rank | Team | Current ELO | Matches | Recent form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Beijing Guoan | 1675 | 26 | |
| 2 |  Chengdu Rongcheng | 1666 | 26 | |
| 3 |  Shanghai Port | 1638 | 26 | |
| 4 |  Shandong Taishan | 1609 | 25 | |
| 5 |  Qingdao West Coast | 1590 | 26 | |
| 6 |  Shanghai Shenhua | 1587 | 26 | |
| 7 |  Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 1566 | 25 | |
| 8 |  Zhejiang FC | 1549 | 26 | |
| 9 |  Yunnan Yukun | 1542 | 26 | |
| 10 |  Henan FC | 1533 | 26 | |
| 11 |  Dalian Yingbo | 1532 | 26 | |
| 12 |  Chongqing Tonglianglong | 1482 | 24 | |
| 13 |  Wuhan Three Towns | 1482 | 26 | |
| 14 |  Shenyang Urban | 1466 | 24 | |
| 15 |  Shenzhen Peng City | 1454 | 26 | |
| 16 |  Qingdao Hainiu | 1389 | 26 |
The ranking uses the latest reliable ELO available for every team in the selected squad. Recent form and the league table use only results from the displayed season.
ELO change is not shown because a consistent variation history is not available across every competition.
| Rank | Team | Matches | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chengdu Rongcheng | 26 | 15 | 7 | 4 | 21 | 52 |
| 2 | Beijing Guoan | 26 | 11 | 10 | 5 | 16 | 43 |
| 3 | Shanghai Shenhua | 26 | 12 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 41 |
| 4 | Shandong Taishan | 25 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 40 |
| 5 | Dalian Yingbo | 26 | 12 | 4 | 10 | -4 | 40 |
| 6 | Shanghai Port | 26 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 38 |
| 7 | Yunnan Yukun | 26 | 11 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 38 |
| 8 | Qingdao West Coast | 26 | 8 | 14 | 4 | -1 | 38 |
| 9 | Zhejiang FC | 26 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 36 |
| 10 | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 25 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 4 | 34 |
| 11 | Henan FC | 26 | 8 | 9 | 9 | -2 | 33 |
| 12 | Shenzhen Peng City | 26 | 8 | 4 | 14 | -11 | 28 |
| 13 | Chongqing Tonglianglong | 24 | 6 | 9 | 9 | -6 | 27 |
| 14 | Wuhan Three Towns | 26 | 5 | 11 | 10 | -7 | 26 |
| 15 | Shenyang Urban | 24 | 7 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 25 |
| 16 | Qingdao Hainiu | 26 | 6 | 3 | 17 | -19 | 21 |
The league table is calculated from available results (three points for a win and one for a draw), with goal difference as the first tiebreaker.
ELO estimates relative team strength using results and opponent strength. It reflects a structural level, while recent form covers a much shorter run of matches. Values update as new match data becomes available.
This page helps you read Chinese Super League through several complementary angles: ELO hierarchy, recent form, match volume, home/away split and overall season structure. The Chinese Super League can change quickly through squad evolution and season phases, so structural reading helps. The goal is not to show a raw table only, but to turn league data into actionable context for result pages, daily match reading and AI football prediction pages.
For a deeper workflow, combine these metrics with daily match analysis, top AI picks, free AI football predictions, team form insights and AI probability reading.
Select a season and read the team table directly. ELO helps compare relative team strength across the league.
ELO gives structural context, while short-term form helps interpret whether momentum supports or contradicts that baseline.
Use the Chinese Super League hub to relate ELO, fixtures, results and historical reliability.
