Foresportia Elo
1567MLS rank : 3rd
Vancouver Whitecaps FC
Foresportia analyses Vancouver Whitecaps FC using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.50Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
0.98Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
1.20Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
52.1%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: Vancouver Whitecaps FC
The defense of Vancouver Whitecaps FC needs attention: 8 goals conceded across the last five recorded matches in MLS. The team have scored 7 goals over these matches. The team have taken 6 points from a possible 15 over these matches.
MLS · 2026 · 30 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 3 | 1 | |
| 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | 3 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates Vancouver Whitecaps FC
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Colorado RapidsElo : 1437
Vancouver Whitecaps FCElo : 1580
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Colorado Rapids 27%Draw 31%Vancouver Whitecaps FC 42%
3. Prediction reliability for Vancouver Whitecaps FC
Data updated on 20 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 70.0% | 10 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 53.3% | 15 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 57.9% | 19 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 58.3% | 24 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 55.6% | 27 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 54.8% | 31 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 52.9% | 34 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 54.3% | 35 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 55.6% | 36 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 57.9% | 38 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 55.8% | 43 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 53.3% | 45 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 54.0% | 50 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 53.7% | 54 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 51.7% | 58 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for Vancouver Whitecaps FC
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.97 pts/matchHigher observed return
Away performance1.72 pts/matchLower observed return
5. Statistical markers for Vancouver Whitecaps FC
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 64 verified matches
6. Market signals for Vancouver Whitecaps FC
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Home win57.1%55.6%9Promising signal, limited sample
Both teams to scoreNot available%56.0%25Success above the average probability
Over 2.5Not available%61.5%26Success above the average probability
Double chance 1XNot available%63.3%30Success above the average probability
Double chance X2Not available%68.2%22Success above the average probability
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Vancouver Whitecaps FC
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Vancouver Whitecaps FC
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Vancouver Whitecaps FC
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Vancouver Whitecaps FC
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Vancouver Whitecaps FC still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Vancouver Whitecaps FC still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is Colorado Rapids vs Vancouver Whitecaps FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 42%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Vancouver Whitecaps FC FAQ
What is the next match for Vancouver Whitecaps FC on Foresportia?
This page shows Vancouver Whitecaps FC's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Vancouver Whitecaps FC's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Vancouver Whitecaps FC's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Vancouver Whitecaps FC?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Vancouver Whitecaps FC, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Vancouver Whitecaps FC: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Vancouver Whitecaps FC still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Vancouver Whitecaps FC still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is Colorado Rapids vs Vancouver Whitecaps FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 42%.