Foresportia Elo
1662MLS rank : 28th
St. Louis CITY SC
Foresportia analyses St. Louis CITY SC using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.56Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.26Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
2.00Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
46.5%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: St. Louis CITY SC
St. Louis CITY SC are enjoying a positive run, taking 10 points from the last five recorded matches in MLS. Their attack is productive, with 14 goals scored against 6 conceded.
MLS · 2026 · 30 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | |
| 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | 0 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates St. Louis CITY SC
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Real Salt Lake CityElo : 1432
St. Louis CITY SCElo : 1641
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Real Salt Lake City 34%Draw 30%St. Louis CITY SC 36%
3. Prediction reliability for St. Louis CITY SC
Data updated on 21 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 30.0% | 10 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 43.8% | 16 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 50.0% | 20 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 58.3% | 24 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 64.3% | 28 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 62.5% | 32 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 58.8% | 34 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 57.1% | 35 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 59.5% | 37 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 57.5% | 40 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 55.6% | 45 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 56.2% | 48 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 52.8% | 53 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 50.9% | 57 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 52.5% | 61 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for St. Louis CITY SC
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.53 pts/matchHigher observed return
Away performance1.06 pts/matchLower observed return
5. Statistical markers for St. Louis CITY SC
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 64 verified matches
6. Market signals for St. Louis CITY SC
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Both teams to scoreNot available%76.0%25Major, well-documented signal
Over 2.5Not available%72.7%22Success above the average probability
Under 2.5Not available%70.0%10Success above the average probability
Double chance 1XNot available%77.4%31Major, well-documented signal
Double chance X2Not available%56.0%25Success above the average probability
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
St. Louis CITY SC
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
St. Louis CITY SC
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
St. Louis CITY SC
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
St. Louis CITY SC
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, St. Louis CITY SC mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
St. Louis CITY SC is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.00 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of 1.34.
The next detected match is Real Salt Lake City vs St. Louis CITY SC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 36%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. St. Louis CITY SC FAQ
What is the next match for St. Louis CITY SC on Foresportia?
This page shows St. Louis CITY SC's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read St. Louis CITY SC's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for St. Louis CITY SC's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for St. Louis CITY SC?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for St. Louis CITY SC, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
St. Louis CITY SC: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, St. Louis CITY SC mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
St. Louis CITY SC is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.00 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of 1.34.
The next detected match is Real Salt Lake City vs St. Louis CITY SC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 36%.