
San Diego FC
Foresportia analyses San Diego FC using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
Current analysis: San Diego FC
San Diego FC are scoring freely, but their defense is vulnerable: 11 goals scored and 14 conceded across the last five recorded matches in MLS. Results have been poor over these matches, with 4 points taken from a possible 15.
MLS · 2026 · 30 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | 1 | |
| 1 | 4 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | 1 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates San Diego FC
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
3. Prediction reliability for San Diego FC
Data updated on 21 October 2026
| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 50.0% | 10 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 60.0% | 15 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 68.4% | 19 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 58.3% | 24 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 59.3% | 27 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 58.1% | 31 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 60.6% | 33 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 60.6% | 33 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 58.3% | 36 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 55.0% | 40 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 53.3% | 45 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 53.2% | 47 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 51.9% | 52 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 48.2% | 56 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 45.8% | 59 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for San Diego FC
5. Statistical markers for San Diego FC
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 64 verified matches
6. Market signals for San Diego FC
7. Model dynamics & analysis
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, San Diego FC mainly shows a more productive attacking profile. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
San Diego FC shows a stronger attacking profile, scoring 2.20 goals per match recently.
The next detected match is San Diego FC vs Seattle Sounders FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 35%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. San Diego FC FAQ
What is the next match for San Diego FC on Foresportia?
This page shows San Diego FC's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read San Diego FC's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for San Diego FC's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for San Diego FC?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for San Diego FC, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
San Diego FC: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, San Diego FC mainly shows a more productive attacking profile. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
San Diego FC shows a stronger attacking profile, scoring 2.20 goals per match recently.
The next detected match is San Diego FC vs Seattle Sounders FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 35%.