Foresportia Elo
1577MLS rank : 29th
Philadelphia Union
Foresportia analyses Philadelphia Union using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.54Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
0.98Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
2.20Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
50.4%Average over 10 predictions1. How Foresportia evaluates Philadelphia Union
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Philadelphia UnionElo : 1586
FC CincinnatiElo : 1546
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Philadelphia Union 50%Draw 27%FC Cincinnati 23%
3. Prediction reliability for Philadelphia Union
Data updated on 06 September 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 70.0% | 10 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 61.5% | 13 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 64.7% | 17 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 61.9% | 21 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 60.0% | 25 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 64.3% | 28 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 63.3% | 30 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 61.3% | 31 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 54.3% | 35 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 55.0% | 40 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 51.1% | 45 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 53.2% | 47 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 51.9% | 52 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 51.9% | 52 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for Philadelphia Union
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance2.00 pts/matchHigher observed return
Away performance1.28 pts/matchLower observed return
5. Statistical markers for Philadelphia Union
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 57 verified matches
6. Market signals for Philadelphia Union
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Both teams to scoreNot available%76.5%17Major, well-documented signal
Over 2.5Not available%71.4%14Success above the average probability
Under 2.5Not available%63.6%11Success above the average probability
Double chance 1XNot available%72.7%22Success above the average probability
Double chance X2Not available%57.1%21Success above the average probability
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Philadelphia Union
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Philadelphia Union
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Philadelphia Union
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Philadelphia Union
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Philadelphia Union mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Philadelphia Union is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.20 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of -0.06.
The next detected match is Philadelphia Union vs FC Cincinnati on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 50%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Philadelphia Union FAQ
What is the next match for Philadelphia Union on Foresportia?
This page shows Philadelphia Union's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Philadelphia Union's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Philadelphia Union's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Philadelphia Union?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Philadelphia Union, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Philadelphia Union: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Philadelphia Union mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Philadelphia Union is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.20 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of -0.06.
The next detected match is Philadelphia Union vs FC Cincinnati on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 50%.