
Orlando City SC
Foresportia analyses Orlando City SC using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
Current analysis: Orlando City SC
The goal tally for Orlando City SC is level across the last five recorded matches in MLS: 14 scored and the same number conceded. The team have taken 7 points from a possible 15 over these matches.
MLS · 2026 · 30 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | 3 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates Orlando City SC
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
3. Prediction reliability for Orlando City SC
Data updated on 21 October 2026
| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 70.0% | 10 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 62.5% | 16 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 65.0% | 20 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 60.0% | 25 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 64.3% | 28 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 61.3% | 31 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 55.9% | 34 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 57.1% | 35 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 61.5% | 39 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 55.8% | 43 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 52.1% | 48 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 50.0% | 50 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 49.1% | 55 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 51.7% | 60 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 51.6% | 62 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for Orlando City SC
5. Statistical markers for Orlando City SC
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 64 verified matches
6. Market signals for Orlando City SC
7. Model dynamics & analysis
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Orlando City SC mainly shows a more productive attacking profile. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Orlando City SC shows a stronger attacking profile, scoring 2.80 goals per match recently.
The next detected match is Orlando City SC vs New York City FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 42%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Orlando City SC FAQ
What is the next match for Orlando City SC on Foresportia?
This page shows Orlando City SC's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Orlando City SC's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Orlando City SC's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Orlando City SC?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Orlando City SC, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Orlando City SC: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Orlando City SC mainly shows a more productive attacking profile. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Orlando City SC shows a stronger attacking profile, scoring 2.80 goals per match recently.
The next detected match is Orlando City SC vs New York City FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 42%.