Foresportia Elo
1510MLS rank : 15th
New York City FC
Foresportia analyses New York City FC using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.56Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
0.49Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
0.60Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
49.4%Average over 10 predictions1. How Foresportia evaluates New York City FC
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
New York City FCElo : 1517
New England RevolutionElo : 1537
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
New York City FC 42%Draw 32%New England Revolution 26%
3. Prediction reliability for New York City FC
Data updated on 06 September 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 30.0% | 10 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 41.2% | 17 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 42.1% | 19 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 45.8% | 24 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 44.4% | 27 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 46.9% | 32 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 47.1% | 34 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 45.7% | 35 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 44.7% | 38 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 41.9% | 43 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 39.6% | 48 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 40.0% | 50 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 38.2% | 55 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 37.5% | 56 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for New York City FC
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.69 pts/matchHigher observed return
Away performance1.29 pts/matchLower observed return
5. Statistical markers for New York City FC
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 57 verified matches
6. Market signals for New York City FC
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Both teams to scoreNot available%66.7%18Success above the average probability
Over 2.5Not available%56.2%16Success above the average probability
Double chance 1XNot available%66.7%24Success above the average probability
Double chance X2Not available%66.7%21Success above the average probability
Double chance 12Not available%66.7%24Success above the average probability
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
New York City FC
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
New York City FC
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
New York City FC
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
New York City FC
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, New York City FC still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
New York City FC still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is New York City FC vs New England Revolution on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 42%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. New York City FC FAQ
What is the next match for New York City FC on Foresportia?
This page shows New York City FC's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read New York City FC's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for New York City FC's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for New York City FC?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for New York City FC, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
New York City FC: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, New York City FC still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
New York City FC still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is New York City FC vs New England Revolution on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 42%.