Foresportia Elo
1676MLS rank : 4th
Nashville SC
Foresportia analyses Nashville SC using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.52Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
0.80Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
2.60Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
48.8%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: Nashville SC
Nashville SC are enjoying a positive run, taking 13 points from the last five recorded matches in MLS. With 14 goals scored and 2 conceded, the team combine a productive attack with a solid defense over these matches.
MLS · 2026 · 30 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates Nashville SC
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
CF MontréalElo : 1316
Nashville SCElo : 1671
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
CF Montréal 21%Draw 30%Nashville SC 49%
3. Prediction reliability for Nashville SC
Data updated on 21 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
62.5%| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 70.0% | 10 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 58.8% | 17 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 65.0% | 20 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 64.0% | 25 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 65.5% | 29 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 68.8% | 32 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 67.6% | 34 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 68.6% | 35 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 66.7% | 39 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 65.1% | 43 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 62.5% | 48 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 62.7% | 51 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 64.3% | 56 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 62.3% | 61 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 62.5% | 64 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for Nashville SC
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance2.47 pts/matchHigher observed return
Away performance1.31 pts/matchLower observed return
5. Statistical markers for Nashville SC
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 64 verified matches
6. Market signals for Nashville SC
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Home win54.2%83.3%6Promising signal, limited sample
Over 2.5Not available%57.9%19Success above the average probability
Home draw no betNot available%63.6%22Success above the average probability
Double chance 1XNot available%77.4%31Major, well-documented signal
Double chance 12Not available%77.4%31Major, well-documented signal
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Nashville SC
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Nashville SC
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Nashville SC
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Nashville SC
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Nashville SC mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Nashville SC is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.60 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of 1.96.
The next detected match is CF Montréal vs Nashville SC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 49%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Nashville SC FAQ
What is the next match for Nashville SC on Foresportia?
This page shows Nashville SC's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Nashville SC's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Nashville SC's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Nashville SC?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Nashville SC, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Nashville SC: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Nashville SC mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Nashville SC is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.60 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of 1.96.
The next detected match is CF Montréal vs Nashville SC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 49%.