Foresportia Elo
1433MLS rank : 6th
Minnesota United FC
Foresportia analyses Minnesota United FC using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.57Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.10Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
1.00Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
46.8%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: Minnesota United FC
Minnesota United FC are scoring freely, but their defense is vulnerable: 10 goals scored and 12 conceded across the last five recorded matches in MLS. The team have taken 5 points from a possible 15 over these matches.
MLS · 2026 · 30 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 | 0 | |
| 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | 3 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates Minnesota United FC
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Houston Dynamo FCElo : 1522
Minnesota United FCElo : 1455
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Houston Dynamo FC 35%Draw 32%Minnesota United FC 33%
3. Prediction reliability for Minnesota United FC
Data updated on 21 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 50.0% | 10 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 43.8% | 16 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 40.0% | 20 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 48.0% | 25 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 44.8% | 29 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 43.8% | 32 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 44.1% | 34 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 44.4% | 36 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 44.7% | 38 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 44.2% | 43 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 39.6% | 48 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 38.0% | 50 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 36.4% | 55 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 35.0% | 60 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 34.9% | 63 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for Minnesota United FC
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.38 pts/matchComparable return
Away performance1.50 pts/matchComparable return
5. Statistical markers for Minnesota United FC
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 64 verified matches
6. Market signals for Minnesota United FC
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Both teams to scoreNot available%80.0%25Major, well-documented signal
Over 2.5Not available%68.2%22Success above the average probability
Double chance 1XNot available%67.7%31Success above the average probability
Double chance X2Not available%65.5%29Success above the average probability
Double chance 12Not available%67.7%31Success above the average probability
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Minnesota United FC
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Minnesota United FC
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Minnesota United FC
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Minnesota United FC
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Minnesota United FC mainly shows a more productive attacking profile. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Minnesota United FC shows a stronger attacking profile, scoring 2.00 goals per match recently.
The next detected match is Houston Dynamo FC vs Minnesota United FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 35%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Minnesota United FC FAQ
What is the next match for Minnesota United FC on Foresportia?
This page shows Minnesota United FC's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Minnesota United FC's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Minnesota United FC's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Minnesota United FC?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Minnesota United FC, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Minnesota United FC: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Minnesota United FC mainly shows a more productive attacking profile. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Minnesota United FC shows a stronger attacking profile, scoring 2.00 goals per match recently.
The next detected match is Houston Dynamo FC vs Minnesota United FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 35%.