Foresportia Elo
1475MLS rank : 24th
Los Angeles Galaxy
Foresportia analyses Los Angeles Galaxy using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.55Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.26Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
2.00Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
51.1%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: Los Angeles Galaxy
Los Angeles Galaxy are enjoying a positive run, taking 10 points from the last five recorded matches in MLS. The goal tally is level over these matches: 12 scored and the same number conceded.
MLS · 2026 · 31 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | 3 | |
| 2 | 6 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | 1 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates Los Angeles Galaxy
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Los Angeles FCElo : 1525
Los Angeles GalaxyElo : 1470
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Los Angeles FC 56%Draw 26%Los Angeles Galaxy 19%
3. Prediction reliability for Los Angeles Galaxy
Data updated on 21 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 70.0% | 10 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 69.2% | 13 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 58.8% | 17 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 55.0% | 20 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 60.9% | 23 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 61.5% | 26 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 58.6% | 29 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 56.7% | 30 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 50.0% | 34 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 46.2% | 39 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 43.2% | 44 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 42.6% | 47 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 44.2% | 52 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 45.6% | 57 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 46.7% | 60 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for Los Angeles Galaxy
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.42 pts/matchHigher observed return
Away performance0.72 pts/matchLower observed return
5. Statistical markers for Los Angeles Galaxy
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 65 verified matches
6. Market signals for Los Angeles Galaxy
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Both teams to scoreNot available%74.1%27Success above the average probability
Over 2.5Not available%61.5%26Success above the average probability
Double chance 1XNot available%74.2%31Success above the average probability
Double chance X2Not available%57.1%28Success above the average probability
Double chance 12Not available%68.8%32Success above the average probability
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Los Angeles Galaxy
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Los Angeles Galaxy
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Los Angeles Galaxy
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Los Angeles Galaxy
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Los Angeles Galaxy mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Los Angeles Galaxy is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.00 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of 0.32.
The next detected match is Los Angeles FC vs Los Angeles Galaxy on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 56%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Los Angeles Galaxy FAQ
What is the next match for Los Angeles Galaxy on Foresportia?
This page shows Los Angeles Galaxy's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Los Angeles Galaxy's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Los Angeles Galaxy's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Los Angeles Galaxy?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Los Angeles Galaxy, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Los Angeles Galaxy: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Los Angeles Galaxy mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Los Angeles Galaxy is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.00 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of 0.32.
The next detected match is Los Angeles FC vs Los Angeles Galaxy on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 56%.