Foresportia Elo
1582MLS rank : 13th
FC Dallas
Foresportia analyses FC Dallas using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.56Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.20Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
1.60Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
49.6%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: FC Dallas
FC Dallas have taken 8 points from a possible 15 across the last five recorded matches in MLS. The team have scored 6 goals and conceded 5.
MLS · 2026 · 30 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | 0 | |
| 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | 1 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates FC Dallas
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
FC DallasElo : 1583
San Jose EarthquakesElo : 1498
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
FC Dallas 46%Draw 28%San Jose Earthquakes 26%
3. Prediction reliability for FC Dallas
Data updated on 19 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
53.1%| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 50.0% | 10 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 53.3% | 15 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 57.9% | 19 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 62.5% | 24 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 59.3% | 27 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 58.1% | 31 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 55.9% | 34 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 57.1% | 35 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 56.4% | 39 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 54.5% | 44 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 57.1% | 49 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 56.9% | 51 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 55.4% | 56 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 54.1% | 61 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 53.1% | 64 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for FC Dallas
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.52 pts/matchComparable return
Away performance1.45 pts/matchComparable return
5. Statistical markers for FC Dallas
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 64 verified matches
6. Market signals for FC Dallas
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Both teams to scoreNot available%69.2%26Success above the average probability
Over 2.5Not available%72.0%25Success above the average probability
Double chance 1XNot available%67.7%31Success above the average probability
Double chance X2Not available%65.5%29Success above the average probability
Double chance 12Not available%71.0%31Success above the average probability
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
FC Dallas
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
FC Dallas
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
FC Dallas
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
FC Dallas
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, FC Dallas still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
FC Dallas still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is FC Dallas vs San Jose Earthquakes on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 46%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. FC Dallas FAQ
What is the next match for FC Dallas on Foresportia?
This page shows FC Dallas's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read FC Dallas's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for FC Dallas's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for FC Dallas?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for FC Dallas, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
FC Dallas: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, FC Dallas still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
FC Dallas still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is FC Dallas vs San Jose Earthquakes on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 46%.