Foresportia Elo
1406MLS rank : 22nd
D.C. United
Foresportia analyses D.C. United using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.47Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.17Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
0.80Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
54.1%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: D.C. United
D.C. United are going through a difficult run, taking 4 points from the last five recorded matches in MLS. Their defense needs attention: 14 goals conceded against 7 scored.
MLS · 2026 · 29 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | 1 | |
| 0 | 4 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1 | 4 | 0 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates D.C. United
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
FC CincinnatiElo : 1443
D.C. UnitedElo : 1383
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
FC Cincinnati 53%Draw 26%D.C. United 21%
3. Prediction reliability for D.C. United
Data updated on 21 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 60.0% | 10 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 50.0% | 16 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 52.6% | 19 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 58.3% | 24 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 53.6% | 28 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 54.8% | 31 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 54.5% | 33 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 52.9% | 34 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 52.6% | 38 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 51.2% | 43 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 47.9% | 48 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 48.0% | 50 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 47.3% | 55 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 46.6% | 58 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 45.8% | 59 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for D.C. United
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.03 pts/matchHigher observed return
Away performance0.84 pts/matchLower observed return
5. Statistical markers for D.C. United
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 63 verified matches
6. Market signals for D.C. United
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Both teams to scoreNot available%70.8%24Success above the average probability
Over 2.5Not available%60.9%23Success above the average probability
Double chance 1XNot available%75.0%28Major, well-documented signal
Double chance X2Not available%69.6%23Success above the average probability
Double chance 12Not available%56.7%30Success above the average probability
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
D.C. United
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
D.C. United
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
D.C. United
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
D.C. United
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, D.C. United still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
D.C. United still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is FC Cincinnati vs D.C. United on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 53%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. D.C. United FAQ
What is the next match for D.C. United on Foresportia?
This page shows D.C. United's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read D.C. United's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for D.C. United's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for D.C. United?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for D.C. United, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
D.C. United: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, D.C. United still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
D.C. United still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is FC Cincinnati vs D.C. United on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 53%.