Foresportia Elo
1501MLS rank : 19th
Columbus Crew
Foresportia analyses Columbus Crew using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.55Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.20Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
2.40Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
48.0%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: Columbus Crew
Columbus Crew are enjoying a positive run, taking 12 points from the last five recorded matches in MLS. Their attack is productive, with 11 goals scored against 5 conceded.
MLS · 2026 · 30 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | 3 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates Columbus Crew
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Columbus CrewElo : 1526
Toronto FCElo : 1532
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Columbus Crew 55%Draw 27%Toronto FC 18%
3. Prediction reliability for Columbus Crew
Data updated on 21 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 60.0% | 10 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 46.7% | 15 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 50.0% | 18 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 56.5% | 23 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 50.0% | 26 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 50.0% | 30 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 50.0% | 32 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 48.5% | 33 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 43.2% | 37 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 45.2% | 42 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 42.6% | 47 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 42.9% | 49 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 43.4% | 53 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 44.8% | 58 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 47.5% | 61 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for Columbus Crew
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.72 pts/matchHigher observed return
Away performance1.06 pts/matchLower observed return
5. Statistical markers for Columbus Crew
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 64 verified matches
6. Market signals for Columbus Crew
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Both teams to scoreNot available%70.4%27Success above the average probability
Over 2.5Not available%78.3%23Major, well-documented signal
Double chance 1XNot available%71.0%31Success above the average probability
Double chance 12Not available%83.9%31Major, well-documented signal
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Columbus Crew
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Columbus Crew
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Columbus Crew
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Columbus Crew
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Columbus Crew mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Columbus Crew is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.40 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of -0.49.
The next detected match is Columbus Crew vs Toronto FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 55%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Columbus Crew FAQ
What is the next match for Columbus Crew on Foresportia?
This page shows Columbus Crew's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Columbus Crew's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Columbus Crew's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Columbus Crew?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Columbus Crew, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Columbus Crew: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Columbus Crew mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Columbus Crew is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.40 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of -0.49.
The next detected match is Columbus Crew vs Toronto FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 55%.