Foresportia Elo
1576MLS rank : 10th
Chicago Fire FC
Foresportia analyses Chicago Fire FC using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.55Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.47Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
1.80Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
48.9%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: Chicago Fire FC
Chicago Fire FC have taken 9 points from a possible 15 across the last five recorded matches in MLS. The team have scored 7 goals and conceded 6.
MLS · 2026 · 30 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| 0 | 1 | 0 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates Chicago Fire FC
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Atlanta United FCElo : 1392
Chicago Fire FCElo : 1549
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Atlanta United FC 31%Draw 30%Chicago Fire FC 39%
3. Prediction reliability for Chicago Fire FC
Data updated on 20 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 70.0% | 10 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 57.1% | 14 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 55.6% | 18 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 52.2% | 23 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 53.8% | 26 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 50.0% | 30 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 45.5% | 33 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 47.1% | 34 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 43.2% | 37 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 42.5% | 40 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 44.4% | 45 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 46.8% | 47 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 46.2% | 52 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 43.9% | 57 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 45.9% | 61 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for Chicago Fire FC
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.62 pts/matchComparable return
Away performance1.53 pts/matchComparable return
5. Statistical markers for Chicago Fire FC
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 64 verified matches
6. Market signals for Chicago Fire FC
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Both teams to scoreNot available%80.0%25Major, well-documented signal
Over 2.5Not available%80.8%26Major, well-documented signal
Double chance 1XNot available%67.7%31Success above the average probability
Double chance X2Not available%55.6%27Success above the average probability
Double chance 12Not available%77.4%31Major, well-documented signal
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Chicago Fire FC
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Chicago Fire FC
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Chicago Fire FC
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Chicago Fire FC
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Chicago Fire FC still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Chicago Fire FC still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is Atlanta United FC vs Chicago Fire FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 39%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Chicago Fire FC FAQ
What is the next match for Chicago Fire FC on Foresportia?
This page shows Chicago Fire FC's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Chicago Fire FC's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Chicago Fire FC's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Chicago Fire FC?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Chicago Fire FC, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Chicago Fire FC: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Chicago Fire FC still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Chicago Fire FC still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is Atlanta United FC vs Chicago Fire FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 39%.