Foresportia Elo
1563MLS rank : 10th
Chicago Fire FC
Foresportia analyses Chicago Fire FC using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.56Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
0.98Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
1.80Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
48.8%Average over 10 predictions1. How Foresportia evaluates Chicago Fire FC
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Chicago Fire FCElo : 1564
Inter Miami CFElo : 1611
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Chicago Fire FC 31%Draw 25%Inter Miami CF 43%
3. Prediction reliability for Chicago Fire FC
Data updated on 06 September 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 70.0% | 10 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 57.1% | 14 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 55.6% | 18 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 52.2% | 23 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 53.8% | 26 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 50.0% | 30 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 45.5% | 33 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 47.1% | 34 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 43.2% | 37 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 42.5% | 40 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 44.4% | 45 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 46.8% | 47 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 46.2% | 52 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 45.3% | 53 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for Chicago Fire FC
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.67 pts/matchComparable return
Away performance1.59 pts/matchComparable return
5. Statistical markers for Chicago Fire FC
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 56 verified matches
6. Market signals for Chicago Fire FC
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Both teams to scoreNot available%88.2%17Major, well-documented signal
Over 2.5Not available%88.9%18Major, well-documented signal
Double chance 1XNot available%69.6%23Success above the average probability
Double chance X2Not available%57.9%19Success above the average probability
Double chance 12Not available%73.9%23Success above the average probability
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Chicago Fire FC
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Chicago Fire FC
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Chicago Fire FC
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Chicago Fire FC
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Chicago Fire FC mainly shows a more productive attacking profile. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Chicago Fire FC shows a stronger attacking profile, scoring 2.20 goals per match recently.
The next detected match is Chicago Fire FC vs Inter Miami CF on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 43%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Chicago Fire FC FAQ
What is the next match for Chicago Fire FC on Foresportia?
This page shows Chicago Fire FC's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Chicago Fire FC's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Chicago Fire FC's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Chicago Fire FC?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Chicago Fire FC, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Chicago Fire FC: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Chicago Fire FC mainly shows a more productive attacking profile. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Chicago Fire FC shows a stronger attacking profile, scoring 2.20 goals per match recently.
The next detected match is Chicago Fire FC vs Inter Miami CF on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 43%.