
Charlotte FC
Foresportia analyses Charlotte FC using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
Current analysis: Charlotte FC
The defense of Charlotte FC needs attention: 9 goals conceded across the last five recorded matches in MLS. The team have scored 8 goals over these matches. The team have taken 7 points from a possible 15 over these matches.
MLS · 2026 · 30 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | 1 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates Charlotte FC
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
3. Prediction reliability for Charlotte FC
Data updated on 21 October 2026
| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 60.0% | 10 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 62.5% | 16 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 60.0% | 20 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 60.0% | 25 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 62.1% | 29 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 62.5% | 32 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 61.8% | 34 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 60.0% | 35 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 53.8% | 39 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 52.3% | 44 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 53.1% | 49 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 51.0% | 51 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 53.6% | 56 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 52.5% | 61 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 53.1% | 64 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for Charlotte FC
5. Statistical markers for Charlotte FC
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 64 verified matches
6. Market signals for Charlotte FC
7. Model dynamics & analysis
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Charlotte FC mainly draws value from its home edge. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Charlotte FC still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is Portland Timbers vs Charlotte FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 38%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Charlotte FC FAQ
What is the next match for Charlotte FC on Foresportia?
This page shows Charlotte FC's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Charlotte FC's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Charlotte FC's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Charlotte FC?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Charlotte FC, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Charlotte FC: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Charlotte FC mainly draws value from its home edge. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Charlotte FC still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is Portland Timbers vs Charlotte FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 38%.