Foresportia Elo
1448Liga Portugal rank : 18th
Casa Pia AC
Foresportia analyses Casa Pia AC using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.45Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.10Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
1.00Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
65.1%Average over 10 predictions1. How Foresportia evaluates Casa Pia AC
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Gil Vicente FCElo : 1512
Casa Pia ACElo : 1434
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Gil Vicente FC 47%Draw 31%Casa Pia AC 21%
3. Prediction reliability for Casa Pia AC
Data updated on 24 August 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2024-09 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2024-10 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2024-11 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2024-12 | Risk | 46.2% | 13 |
| 2025-01 | Risk | 40.0% | 15 |
| 2025-02 | Risk | 36.8% | 19 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | 40.9% | 22 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 40.0% | 25 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 40.7% | 27 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 42.9% | 28 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 45.2% | 31 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 43.8% | 32 |
| 2025-11 | Risk | 45.5% | 33 |
| 2025-12 | Risk | 45.9% | 37 |
| 2026-01 | Risk | 46.2% | 39 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 43.9% | 41 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 40.9% | 44 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 43.8% | 48 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 41.2% | 51 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 41.2% | 51 |
| 2024-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-11 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-12 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-01 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | 90.0% | 10 |
| 2025-11 | Correct and above | 83.3% | 12 |
| 2025-12 | Correct and above | 83.3% | 12 |
| 2026-01 | Correct and above | 84.6% | 13 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | 80.0% | 15 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | 80.0% | 15 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | 75.0% | 16 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | 70.6% | 17 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | 72.2% | 18 |
| 2024-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-12 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-01 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2025-12 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2026-01 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2024-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-12 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-01 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-12 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-01 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 7 |
4. Predictive profile for Casa Pia AC
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.23 pts/matchHigher observed return
Away performance0.88 pts/matchLower observed return
5. Statistical markers for Casa Pia AC
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 69 verified matches
6. Market signals for Casa Pia AC
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Double chance 1X70.2%86.7%15Major, well-documented signal
Under 2.558.3%68.8%16Success above the average probability
Double chance 1271.4%63.2%19Success below the average probability
Double chance X269.2%56.2%16Success below the average probability
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Casa Pia AC
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Casa Pia AC
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Casa Pia AC
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Casa Pia AC
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Casa Pia AC still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Casa Pia AC still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is Gil Vicente FC vs Casa Pia AC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 47%.
72/100
AI verdictStrong predictive reliability
Correct and above: 72.2% success across 18 verified 1X2 predictions.
Verify the complete history →Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Casa Pia AC FAQ
What is the next match for Casa Pia AC on Foresportia?
This page shows Casa Pia AC's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Casa Pia AC's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Casa Pia AC's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Casa Pia AC?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Casa Pia AC, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Casa Pia AC: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Casa Pia AC still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Casa Pia AC still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is Gil Vicente FC vs Casa Pia AC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 47%.