Foresportia Elo
1469MLS rank : 24th
Austin FC
Foresportia analyses Austin FC using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.53Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
0.49Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
0.40Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
51.4%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: Austin FC
Austin FC are going through a difficult run, taking 2 points from the last five recorded matches in MLS. Their defense needs attention: 12 goals conceded against 6 scored.
MLS · 2026 · 30 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | 1 | |
| 1 | 4 | 0 | |
| 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| 1 | 2 | 0 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates Austin FC
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Sporting Kansas CityElo : 1346
Austin FCElo : 1455
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Sporting Kansas City 33%Draw 30%Austin FC 37%
3. Prediction reliability for Austin FC
Data updated on 21 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 60.0% | 15 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 57.9% | 19 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 54.5% | 22 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 50.0% | 26 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 53.3% | 30 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 48.5% | 33 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 47.1% | 34 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 47.4% | 38 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 46.5% | 43 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 47.9% | 48 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 48.0% | 50 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 47.3% | 55 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 43.3% | 60 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 46.0% | 63 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for Austin FC
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.44 pts/matchHigher observed return
Away performance1.00 pts/matchLower observed return
5. Statistical markers for Austin FC
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 64 verified matches
6. Market signals for Austin FC
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Both teams to scoreNot available%72.0%25Success above the average probability
Over 2.5Not available%72.7%22Success above the average probability
Home win by 2+Not available%60.0%5Promising signal, limited sample
Double chance 1XNot available%73.3%30Success above the average probability
Double chance X2Not available%60.0%25Success above the average probability
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Austin FC
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Austin FC
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Austin FC
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Austin FC
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Austin FC still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Austin FC still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is Sporting Kansas City vs Austin FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 37%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Austin FC FAQ
What is the next match for Austin FC on Foresportia?
This page shows Austin FC's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Austin FC's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Austin FC's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Austin FC?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Austin FC, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Austin FC: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Austin FC still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Austin FC still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is Sporting Kansas City vs Austin FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 37%.