Al-Hazm
Standing#9
Elo rating1472
Form index33.3%
Expected goals1.61
20:00
Al Taawon
Standing#6
Elo rating1501
Form index46.7%
Expected goals2.17
Quick read
- Main predictionOpen match; slight edge for Al Taawon at 54.8%, so caution is advised.
- Confidence levelRisk
- Cautious marketDouble chance X2 · 81.9%
- Likely score1 - 2 (8.64%)
- BTTSYes · 54.2%
- Over/Under 2.5Over 2.5 · 53.3%
1X2 probabilities
Main pickAl Taawon54.8%
Confidence82.4%
StabilityRisk
Expected goals and trends
Over 53.3% Under 46.7%
Yes 54.2% No 45.8%
Double chance
Available markets
Top 5 likely scores
- Likely score 1 - 2 — 8.6%
- Likely score 1 - 1 — 8%
- Likely score 2 - 2 — 7%
- Likely score 2 - 1 — 6.4%
- Likely score 1 - 3 — 6.2%
Advanced scenarios
Clean sheet
Draw no bet
Win to nil
Win by 2+ goals
Verified predictionIncorrect
Al-Hazm vs Al Taawon prediction FAQ
What is the prediction for Al-Hazm vs Al Taawon?
The model sees an open match and gives Al Taawon a slight edge at 54.8%; caution is appropriate.
What is the likely score?
The model's first score scenario is 1 - 2 (8.64%). An exact score remains one scenario among several.
Is BTTS likely?
The model estimates BTTS Yes at 54.2% and BTTS No at 45.8%.
Which market is the most cautious according to the model?
Double chance X2 stands at 81.9%, without being certain.
More football tools and analysis
Check today's matches and updated results, compare standings and team form, then explore more fixtures and AI analysis from this league.
Saudi Pro League
What the data says about Al-Hazm vs Al Taawon
This Saudi Pro League fixture is presented using the competition calendar, the available standings and the teams' recent form.
Before kick-off, Al-Hazm sits 9th and Al Taawon 6th in the table. Their Elo ratings are 1472 for Al-Hazm and 1501 for Al Taawon.
Across the five latest available matches, the form index is 33.3% for Al-Hazm and 46.7% for Al Taawon. It measures recent momentum but does not decide the result on its own.
The 1X2 projection gives Al-Hazm 18.1%, the draw 27.1% and Al Taawon 54.8%. The expected-goals model projects 1.61 xG against 2.17, for a combined 3.78.