Rubin
Standing—
Elo rating1509
Form index53.3%
Expected goals0.90
17:00
FC Krasnodar
Standing—
Elo rating1550
Form index80%
Expected goals1.01
Quick read
- Main predictionOpen match; slight edge for FC Krasnodar at 56%, so caution is advised.
- Confidence levelRisk
- Cautious marketDouble chance X2 · 84.3%
- Likely score0 - 1 (14.93%)
- BTTSNo · 50.6%
- Over/Under 2.5Under 2.5 · 52.3%
First AI projection
This early estimate is published ahead of the match. Probabilities may change with recent form, injuries, line-ups, scheduling and newly available data.
Main pickFC Krasnodar56%
Confidence48.9%
StabilityRisk
Expected goals and trends
Over 47.7% Under 52.3%
Yes 49.4% No 50.6%
Double chance
Available markets
Top 5 likely scores
- Likely score 0 - 1 — 14.9%
- Likely score 0 - 0 — 14.8%
- Likely score 1 - 1 — 13.5%
- Likely score 1 - 0 — 13.3%
- Likely score 0 - 2 — 7.5%
Advanced scenarios
Clean sheet
Draw no bet
Win to nil
Win by 2+ goals
Rubin vs FC Krasnodar early projection FAQ
What does the first AI projection say about Rubin vs FC Krasnodar?
The early estimate gives FC Krasnodar a slight edge at 56%. This probability may change before the match.
Why can this estimate change?
Recent form, injuries, line-ups, fixture congestion and newly available data will be included in later updates.
Is an early likely score available?
The first calculated scenario is 0 - 1 (14.93%), but this is an early estimate that may change.
More football tools and analysis
Check today's matches and updated results, compare standings and team form, then explore more fixtures and AI analysis from this league.
Russia
What the data says about Rubin vs FC Krasnodar
This Russia fixture is presented using the competition calendar, the available standings and the teams' recent form.
Across the five latest available matches, the form index is 53.3% for Rubin and 80% for FC Krasnodar. It measures recent momentum but does not decide the result on its own.
The 1X2 projection gives Rubin 15.7%, the draw 28.3% and FC Krasnodar 56%. The expected-goals model projects 0.90 xG against 1.01, for a combined 1.91.