Foresportia Elo
1544Chinese Super League rank : 11th
Zhejiang FC
Foresportia analyses Zhejiang FC using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.52Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.47Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
1.20Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
50.6%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: Zhejiang FC
Zhejiang FC are scoring freely, but their defense is vulnerable: 13 goals scored and 12 conceded across the last five recorded matches in Chinese Super League. The team have taken 6 points from a possible 15 over these matches.
Chinese Super League · 2026 · 28 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 4 | 0 | |
| 0 | 5 | 0 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates Zhejiang FC
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Shenyang UrbanElo : 1482
Zhejiang FCElo : 1524
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Shenyang Urban 33%Draw 27%Zhejiang FC 40%
3. Prediction reliability for Zhejiang FC
Data updated on 21 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 50.0% | 10 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 38.5% | 13 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 37.5% | 16 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 33.3% | 18 |
| 2025-11 | Risk | 31.6% | 19 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 33.3% | 21 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 29.2% | 24 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 25.0% | 28 |
| 2026-06 | Risk | 24.1% | 29 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 28.1% | 32 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 33.3% | 36 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 34.2% | 38 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 37.5% | 40 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | 80.0% | 10 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | 80.0% | 10 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | 81.8% | 11 |
| 2025-11 | Correct and above | 81.8% | 11 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | 83.3% | 12 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | 78.6% | 14 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | 70.6% | 17 |
| 2026-06 | Correct and above | 70.6% | 17 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | 72.2% | 18 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | 72.2% | 18 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | 72.2% | 18 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | 72.2% | 18 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
4. Predictive profile for Zhejiang FC
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.72 pts/matchHigher observed return
Away performance0.97 pts/matchLower observed return
5. Statistical markers for Zhejiang FC
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 58 verified matches
6. Market signals for Zhejiang FC
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Double chance 1X69.9%78.6%28Major, well-documented signal
Double chance 1273.6%75.9%29Major, well-documented signal
Over 2.561.3%73.1%26Success above the average probability
Both teams to score61.3%69.2%26Confirmed signal
Home win55.0%63.6%11Success above the average probability
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Zhejiang FC
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Zhejiang FC
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Zhejiang FC
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Zhejiang FC
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Zhejiang FC mainly shows a more productive attacking profile. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Zhejiang FC shows a stronger attacking profile, scoring 2.60 goals per match recently.
The next detected match is Shenyang Urban vs Zhejiang FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 40%.
AI verdictStrong predictive reliability
Correct and above: 72.2% success across 18 verified 1X2 predictions.
Verify the complete history →Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Zhejiang FC FAQ
What is the next match for Zhejiang FC on Foresportia?
This page shows Zhejiang FC's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Zhejiang FC's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Zhejiang FC's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Zhejiang FC?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Zhejiang FC, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Zhejiang FC: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Zhejiang FC mainly shows a more productive attacking profile. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Zhejiang FC shows a stronger attacking profile, scoring 2.60 goals per match recently.
The next detected match is Shenyang Urban vs Zhejiang FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 40%.