Foresportia Elo
1537Jupiler Pro League rank : 9th
Standard de Liège
Foresportia analyses Standard de Liège using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.57Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.47Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
1.20Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
40.2%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: Standard de Liège
The defense of Standard de Liège needs attention: 8 goals conceded across the last five recorded matches in Jupiler Pro League. The team have scored 6 goals over these matches. The team have taken 6 points from a possible 15 over these matches. More matches this season are needed to confirm this trend.
Jupiler Pro League · 2026-2027 · 8 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| 2 | 4 | 0 | |
| 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0 | 1 | 0 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates Standard de Liège
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
KRC GenkElo : 1576
Standard de LiègeElo : 1522
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
KRC Genk 53%Draw 28%Standard de Liège 19%
3. Prediction reliability for Standard de Liège
Data updated on 21 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-08 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2024-09 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2024-10 | Risk | 40.0% | 10 |
| 2024-11 | Risk | 46.2% | 13 |
| 2024-12 | Risk | 47.1% | 17 |
| 2025-01 | Risk | 50.0% | 20 |
| 2025-02 | Risk | 52.2% | 23 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | 56.0% | 25 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 53.8% | 26 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 53.3% | 30 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 51.5% | 33 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 52.8% | 36 |
| 2025-11 | Risk | 51.3% | 39 |
| 2025-12 | Risk | 51.2% | 43 |
| 2026-01 | Risk | 53.3% | 45 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 51.0% | 49 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 48.1% | 52 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 49.1% | 57 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 48.4% | 62 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 48.5% | 66 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 49.3% | 69 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 50.0% | 70 |
| 2024-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-11 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2024-12 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-01 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2025-11 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2025-12 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2026-01 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2024-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-12 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-01 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-12 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-01 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2024-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-12 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-01 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-12 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-01 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for Standard de Liège
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.38 pts/matchComparable return
Away performance1.36 pts/matchComparable return
5. Statistical markers for Standard de Liège
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 78 verified matches
6. Market signals for Standard de Liège
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Double chance X264.6%75.0%24Major, well-documented signal
Double chance 1268.2%69.2%26Confirmed signal
Both teams to score52.4%63.6%11Success above the average probability
Double chance 1X69.4%56.0%25Success below the average probability
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Standard de Liège
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Standard de Liège
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Standard de Liège
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Standard de Liège
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Standard de Liège still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Standard de Liège still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is KRC Genk vs Standard de Liège on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 53%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Standard de Liège FAQ
What is the next match for Standard de Liège on Foresportia?
This page shows Standard de Liège's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Standard de Liège's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Standard de Liège's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Standard de Liège?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Standard de Liège, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Standard de Liège: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Standard de Liège still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Standard de Liège still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is KRC Genk vs Standard de Liège on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 53%.