Foresportia Elo
1659Chinese Super League rank : 5th
Shanghai Port
Foresportia analyses Shanghai Port using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.47Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
0.80Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
2.60Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
52.1%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: Shanghai Port
Shanghai Port are enjoying a positive run, taking 13 points from the last five recorded matches in Chinese Super League. With 10 goals scored and 3 conceded, the team combine a productive attack with a solid defense over these matches.
Chinese Super League · 2026 · 28 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates Shanghai Port
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Tianjin Jinmen TigerElo : 1610
Shanghai PortElo : 1679
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 21%Draw 28%Shanghai Port 51%
3. Prediction reliability for Shanghai Port
Data updated on 20 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 60.0% | 10 |
| 2025-11 | Risk | 63.6% | 11 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 53.8% | 13 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 53.3% | 15 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 44.4% | 18 |
| 2026-06 | Risk | 47.4% | 19 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 45.5% | 22 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 48.0% | 25 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 46.2% | 26 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 50.0% | 28 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | 90.9% | 11 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | 84.6% | 13 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | 82.4% | 17 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | 82.4% | 17 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | 84.2% | 19 |
| 2025-11 | Correct and above | 84.2% | 19 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | 85.0% | 20 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | 82.6% | 23 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | 70.4% | 27 |
| 2026-06 | Correct and above | 70.4% | 27 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | 70.4% | 27 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | 70.0% | 30 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | 70.0% | 30 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | 70.0% | 30 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2026-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2026-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 7 |
4. Predictive profile for Shanghai Port
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.86 pts/matchComparable return
Away performance1.93 pts/matchComparable return
5. Statistical markers for Shanghai Port
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 58 verified matches
6. Market signals for Shanghai Port
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Double chance 1273.9%72.4%29Robust signal
Double chance 1X71.3%68.0%25Confirmed signal
Both teams to score58.6%65.4%26Confirmed signal
Double chance X270.2%63.2%19Recurring signal
Over 2.559.2%56.0%25Recurring signal
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Shanghai Port
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Shanghai Port
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Shanghai Port
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Shanghai Port
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Shanghai Port mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Shanghai Port is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.60 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of 0.16.
The next detected match is Tianjin Jinmen Tiger vs Shanghai Port on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 51%.
AI verdictStrong predictive reliability
Correct and above: 70.0% success across 30 verified 1X2 predictions.
Verify the complete history →Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Shanghai Port FAQ
What is the next match for Shanghai Port on Foresportia?
This page shows Shanghai Port's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Shanghai Port's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Shanghai Port's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Shanghai Port?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Shanghai Port, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Shanghai Port: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Shanghai Port mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Shanghai Port is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.60 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of 0.16.
The next detected match is Tianjin Jinmen Tiger vs Shanghai Port on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 51%.