Logo RB Leipzig

RB Leipzig

Leipzig

GermanyBundesliga2026-2027

Foresportia analyses RB Leipzig using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.

Foresportia Elo
1597Bundesliga rank : 4th
1X2 entropy
1.44Lower = easier to read
Points volatility
1.20Standard deviation over 5 matches
Recent form
2.40Points per match over 5 matches
Model confidence
59.4%Average over 10 predictions

Current analysis: RB Leipzig

RB Leipzig are scoring freely, but their defense is vulnerable: 18 goals scored and 8 conceded across the last five recorded matches in Bundesliga. Results have been positive over these matches, with 12 points taken from a possible 15. More matches this season are needed to confirm this trend.

Bundesliga · 2026-2027 · 9 matches analyzed

View analyzed match details
Matches analyzed (up to 5)
DateGoals scoredGoals concededPoints
603
160
403
203
523

1. How Foresportia evaluates RB Leipzig

Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.

1597Foresportia EloBundesliga rank : 4th
1.441X2 entropyLower = easier to read
1.20Points volatilityStandard deviation over 5 matches
2.40Recent formpoints / match
59.4%Model confidenceAverage over 10 predictions

2. Next match

Bundesliga

1.FC Union BerlinElo : 1437
VS
RB LeipzigElo : 1631
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
24%29%47%
1.FC Union Berlin 24%Draw 29%RB Leipzig 47%
Main signalAway win · 47%
Model confidence48.4%
StabilityRisk
View match details →

3. Prediction reliability for RB Leipzig

Data updated on 14 November 2026

Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
100.0%
Cumulative monthly historyProfileReliabilityVolume
2024-08RiskInsufficient sample1
2024-09RiskInsufficient sample2
2024-10RiskInsufficient sample4
2024-11RiskInsufficient sample7
2024-12RiskInsufficient sample8
2025-01Risk50.0%12
2025-02Risk43.8%16
2025-03Risk40.0%20
2025-04Risk45.5%22
2025-05Risk40.0%25
2025-08Risk40.0%25
2025-09Risk38.5%26
2025-10Risk37.0%27
2025-11Risk35.7%28
2025-12Risk33.3%30
2026-01Risk35.3%34
2026-02Risk36.1%36
2026-03Risk39.5%38
2026-04Risk42.5%40
2026-05Risk42.9%42
2026-08Risk44.2%43
2026-09Risk44.4%45
2026-10Risk45.7%46
2026-11Risk45.7%46
2024-08Correct and aboveInsufficient sample1
2024-09Correct and aboveInsufficient sample3
2024-10Correct and aboveInsufficient sample4
2024-11Correct and aboveInsufficient sample5
2024-12Correct and aboveInsufficient sample7
2025-01Correct and aboveInsufficient sample7
2025-02Correct and aboveInsufficient sample7
2025-03Correct and aboveInsufficient sample7
2025-04Correct and aboveInsufficient sample9
2025-05Correct and aboveInsufficient sample9
2025-08Correct and above72.7%11
2025-09Correct and above76.9%13
2025-10Correct and above80.0%15
2025-11Correct and above77.8%18
2025-12Correct and above78.9%19
2026-01Correct and above80.0%20
2026-02Correct and above76.2%21
2026-03Correct and above78.3%23
2026-04Correct and above80.0%25
2026-05Correct and above80.8%26
2026-08Correct and above80.8%26
2026-09Correct and above81.5%27
2026-10Correct and above83.3%30
2026-11Correct and above83.9%31
2024-08Stable and aboveInsufficient sample1
2024-09Stable and aboveInsufficient sample2
2024-10Stable and aboveInsufficient sample2
2024-11Stable and aboveInsufficient sample2
2024-12Stable and aboveInsufficient sample3
2025-01Stable and aboveInsufficient sample3
2025-02Stable and aboveInsufficient sample3
2025-03Stable and aboveInsufficient sample3
2025-04Stable and aboveInsufficient sample3
2025-05Stable and aboveInsufficient sample3
2025-08Stable and aboveInsufficient sample5
2025-09Stable and aboveInsufficient sample6
2025-10Stable and aboveInsufficient sample8
2025-11Stable and above100.0%10
2025-12Stable and above100.0%11
2026-01Stable and above100.0%12
2026-02Stable and above100.0%12
2026-03Stable and above100.0%12
2026-04Stable and above100.0%13
2026-05Stable and above100.0%14
2026-08Stable and above100.0%14
2026-09Stable and above100.0%15
2026-10Stable and above100.0%16
2026-11Stable and above100.0%16
2024-08Ultra stableInsufficient sample1
2024-09Ultra stableInsufficient sample1
2024-10Ultra stableInsufficient sample1
2024-11Ultra stableInsufficient sample1
2024-12Ultra stableInsufficient sample1
2025-01Ultra stableInsufficient sample1
2025-02Ultra stableInsufficient sample1
2025-03Ultra stableInsufficient sample1
2025-04Ultra stableInsufficient sample1
2025-05Ultra stableInsufficient sample1
2025-08Ultra stableInsufficient sample2
2025-09Ultra stableInsufficient sample2
2025-10Ultra stableInsufficient sample3
2025-11Ultra stableInsufficient sample5
2025-12Ultra stableInsufficient sample6
2026-01Ultra stableInsufficient sample6
2026-02Ultra stableInsufficient sample6
2026-03Ultra stableInsufficient sample6
2026-04Ultra stableInsufficient sample6
2026-05Ultra stableInsufficient sample6
2026-08Ultra stableInsufficient sample6
2026-09Ultra stableInsufficient sample6
2026-10Ultra stableInsufficient sample6
2026-11Ultra stableInsufficient sample6

4. Predictive profile for RB Leipzig

ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance2.13 pts/matchHigher observed return
Away performance1.34 pts/matchLower observed return

5. Statistical markers for RB Leipzig

Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.

Expected goals created at home1.43
Expected goals conceded at home0.73
Expected goals created away1.08
Expected goals conceded away0.90
Goals scored / match (5)3.60
Goals conceded / match (5)1.60

History: 77 verified matches

6. Market signals for RB Leipzig

MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Double chance 1273.7%92.9%28Major, well-documented signal
Double chance 1X75.2%90.9%22Major, well-documented signal
Home draw no bet72.3%88.9%18Major, well-documented signal
Home win58.8%83.3%12Success above the average probability
Over 2.559.8%73.7%19Success above the average probability

7. Model dynamics & analysis

Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
RB Leipzig
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
RB Leipzig
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect

8. Foresportia analysis

For Foresportia, RB Leipzig mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.

RB Leipzig is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.40 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of 0.89.

The next detected match is 1.FC Union Berlin vs RB Leipzig on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 47%.

AI verdictHigh predictive reliability

Stable and above: 100.0% success across 16 verified 1X2 predictions.

Verify the complete history →

Continue exploring

Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.

9. RB Leipzig FAQ

What is the next match for RB Leipzig on Foresportia?

This page shows RB Leipzig's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.

How should you read RB Leipzig's ranking and Elo?

This page includes dedicated charts for RB Leipzig's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.

What does the strongest picks block mean for RB Leipzig?

It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for RB Leipzig, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.

RB Leipzig: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals

For Foresportia, RB Leipzig mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.

RB Leipzig is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.40 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of 0.89.

The next detected match is 1.FC Union Berlin vs RB Leipzig on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 47%.