Foresportia Elo
1562Jupiler Pro League rank : 9th
KRC Genk
Foresportia analyses KRC Genk using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.54Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.20Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
1.60Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
46.9%Average over 10 predictions1. How Foresportia evaluates KRC Genk
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
RSC AnderlechtElo : 1518
KRC GenkElo : 1579
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
RSC Anderlecht 36%Draw 30%KRC Genk 34%
3. Prediction reliability for KRC Genk
Data updated on 06 September 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-08 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2024-09 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2024-10 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2024-11 | Risk | 63.6% | 11 |
| 2024-12 | Risk | 50.0% | 14 |
| 2025-01 | Risk | 56.2% | 16 |
| 2025-02 | Risk | 52.6% | 19 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | 52.4% | 21 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 54.5% | 22 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 53.8% | 26 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 53.3% | 30 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 51.5% | 33 |
| 2025-11 | Risk | 50.0% | 36 |
| 2025-12 | Risk | 50.0% | 40 |
| 2026-01 | Risk | 47.6% | 42 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 50.0% | 46 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 50.0% | 50 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 49.1% | 55 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 47.5% | 61 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 46.9% | 64 |
| 2024-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2024-11 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2024-12 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-01 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2025-11 | Correct and above | 90.0% | 10 |
| 2025-12 | Correct and above | 90.0% | 10 |
| 2026-01 | Correct and above | 90.0% | 10 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | 90.0% | 10 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | 90.0% | 10 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | 90.0% | 10 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | 90.0% | 10 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | 90.0% | 10 |
| 2024-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-12 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-01 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-12 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-01 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2024-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-12 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-01 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-12 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-01 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 4 |
4. Predictive profile for KRC Genk
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance2.03 pts/matchHigher observed return
Away performance1.55 pts/matchLower observed return
5. Statistical markers for KRC Genk
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 74 verified matches
6. Market signals for KRC Genk
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Double chance 1X68.4%72.7%22Robust signal
Double chance X265.2%66.7%18Confirmed signal
Double chance 1271.8%65.2%23Confirmed signal
Home win56.1%60.0%5Promising signal, limited sample
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
KRC Genk
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
KRC Genk
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
KRC Genk
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
KRC Genk
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, KRC Genk mainly shows a more productive attacking profile. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
KRC Genk shows a stronger attacking profile, scoring 2.20 goals per match recently.
The next detected match is RSC Anderlecht vs KRC Genk on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 36%.
AI verdictHigh predictive reliability
Correct and above: 90.0% success across 10 verified 1X2 predictions.
Verify the complete history →Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. KRC Genk FAQ
What is the next match for KRC Genk on Foresportia?
This page shows KRC Genk's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read KRC Genk's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for KRC Genk's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for KRC Genk?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for KRC Genk, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
KRC Genk: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, KRC Genk mainly shows a more productive attacking profile. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
KRC Genk shows a stronger attacking profile, scoring 2.20 goals per match recently.
The next detected match is RSC Anderlecht vs KRC Genk on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 36%.