Foresportia Elo
1672Allsvenskan rank : 3rd
Hammarby IF
Foresportia analyses Hammarby IF using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.44Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.26Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
2.00Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
53.0%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: Hammarby IF
Hammarby IF are enjoying a positive run, taking 10 points from the last five recorded matches in Allsvenskan. Their defense has held firm: 3 goals conceded against 6 goals scored.
Allsvenskan · 2026 · 24 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1 | 0 | 3 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates Hammarby IF
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Mjällby AIFElo : 1496
Hammarby IFElo : 1678
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Mjällby AIF 25%Draw 31%Hammarby IF 44%
3. Prediction reliability for Hammarby IF
Data updated on 21 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 66.7% | 12 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 60.0% | 15 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 55.6% | 18 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 55.0% | 20 |
| 2025-11 | Risk | 55.0% | 20 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 50.0% | 22 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 50.0% | 26 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 50.0% | 28 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 50.0% | 30 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 50.0% | 32 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 48.5% | 33 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2025-11 | Correct and above | 80.0% | 10 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | 76.9% | 13 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | 73.3% | 15 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | 76.5% | 17 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | 78.9% | 19 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | 80.0% | 20 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | 81.0% | 21 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 2 |
4. Predictive profile for Hammarby IF
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance2.41 pts/matchHigher observed return
Away performance1.59 pts/matchLower observed return
5. Statistical markers for Hammarby IF
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 54 verified matches
6. Market signals for Hammarby IF
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Double chance 1272.6%84.0%25Major, well-documented signal
Double chance 1X73.5%80.0%20Major, well-documented signal
Home draw no bet72.5%71.4%14Robust signal
Home win63.6%75.0%8Promising signal, limited sample
Away win56.4%60.0%5Promising signal, limited sample
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Hammarby IF
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Hammarby IF
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Hammarby IF
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Hammarby IF
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Hammarby IF mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Hammarby IF is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.00 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of 1.09.
The next detected match is Mjällby AIF vs Hammarby IF on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 44%.
AI verdictHigh predictive reliability
Correct and above: 81.0% success across 21 verified 1X2 predictions.
Verify the complete history →Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Hammarby IF FAQ
What is the next match for Hammarby IF on Foresportia?
This page shows Hammarby IF's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Hammarby IF's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Hammarby IF's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Hammarby IF?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Hammarby IF, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Hammarby IF: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Hammarby IF mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Hammarby IF is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.00 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of 1.09.
The next detected match is Mjällby AIF vs Hammarby IF on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 44%.