Foresportia Elo
1373K League 1 rank : 12th
Gwangju FC
Foresportia analyses Gwangju FC using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.50Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.10Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
1.00Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
48.9%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: Gwangju FC
Gwangju FC are scoring freely, but their defense is vulnerable: 9 goals scored and 10 conceded across the last five recorded matches in K League 1. The team have taken 5 points from a possible 15 over these matches.
K League 1 · 2026 · 31 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | 0 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates Gwangju FC
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Bucheon FC 1995Elo : 1425
Gwangju FCElo : 1367
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Bucheon FC 1995 47%Draw 27%Gwangju FC 27%
3. Prediction reliability for Gwangju FC
Data updated on 20 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 30.0% | 10 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 37.5% | 16 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 38.1% | 21 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 37.5% | 24 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 32.1% | 28 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 35.5% | 31 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 35.3% | 34 |
| 2025-11 | Risk | 42.1% | 38 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 40.5% | 42 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 45.7% | 46 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 48.0% | 50 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 48.1% | 54 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 50.0% | 60 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 49.2% | 63 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 49.2% | 65 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-11 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for Gwangju FC
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.03 pts/matchComparable return
Away performance0.97 pts/matchComparable return
5. Statistical markers for Gwangju FC
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 69 verified matches
6. Market signals for Gwangju FC
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Double chance X270.4%79.2%24Major, well-documented signal
Double chance 1X69.3%72.0%25Robust signal
Away draw no bet66.2%64.7%17Recurring signal
Double chance 1271.4%62.5%32Success below the average probability
Home win by 2+64.6%75.0%4Promising signal, limited sample
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Gwangju FC
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Gwangju FC
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Gwangju FC
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Gwangju FC
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Gwangju FC mainly shows a more productive attacking profile. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Gwangju FC shows a stronger attacking profile, scoring 1.80 goals per match recently.
The next detected match is Bucheon FC 1995 vs Gwangju FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 47%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Gwangju FC FAQ
What is the next match for Gwangju FC on Foresportia?
This page shows Gwangju FC's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Gwangju FC's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Gwangju FC's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Gwangju FC?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Gwangju FC, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Gwangju FC: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Gwangju FC mainly shows a more productive attacking profile. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Gwangju FC shows a stronger attacking profile, scoring 1.80 goals per match recently.
The next detected match is Bucheon FC 1995 vs Gwangju FC on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 47%.