Foresportia Elo
1410Super League rank : 11th
Grasshopper Club Zurich
Foresportia analyses Grasshopper Club Zurich using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.53Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.17Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
0.80Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
48.8%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: Grasshopper Club Zurich
Grasshopper Club Zurich are going through a difficult run, taking 4 points from the last five recorded matches in Super League. Their defense needs attention: 14 goals conceded against 6 scored. More matches this season are needed to confirm this trend.
Super League · 2026-2027 · 9 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| 2 | 5 | 0 | |
| 1 | 5 | 0 | |
| 0 | 2 | 0 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates Grasshopper Club Zurich
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
FC Bâle 1893Elo : 1484
Grasshopper Club ZurichElo : 1397
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
FC Bâle 1893 52%Draw 27%Grasshopper Club Zurich 21%
3. Prediction reliability for Grasshopper Club Zurich
Data updated on 21 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 45.5% | 11 |
| 2025-11 | Risk | 40.0% | 15 |
| 2025-12 | Risk | 44.4% | 18 |
| 2026-01 | Risk | 42.9% | 21 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 36.0% | 25 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 33.3% | 27 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 40.0% | 30 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 42.9% | 35 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 41.7% | 36 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 44.7% | 38 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 44.2% | 43 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 45.5% | 44 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-11 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-12 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-01 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-12 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-01 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-12 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-01 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for Grasshopper Club Zurich
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance0.88 pts/matchComparable return
Away performance0.88 pts/matchComparable return
5. Statistical markers for Grasshopper Club Zurich
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 48 verified matches
6. Market signals for Grasshopper Club Zurich
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Double chance 1273.3%79.3%29Major, well-documented signal
Over 2.556.8%66.7%15Success above the average probability
Double chance 1X66.3%63.0%27Recurring signal
Double chance X263.4%63.0%27Recurring signal
Both teams to score58.1%63.2%19Recurring signal
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Grasshopper Club Zurich
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Grasshopper Club Zurich
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Grasshopper Club Zurich
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Grasshopper Club Zurich
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Grasshopper Club Zurich still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Grasshopper Club Zurich still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is FC Bâle 1893 vs Grasshopper Club Zurich on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 52%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Grasshopper Club Zurich FAQ
What is the next match for Grasshopper Club Zurich on Foresportia?
This page shows Grasshopper Club Zurich's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Grasshopper Club Zurich's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Grasshopper Club Zurich's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Grasshopper Club Zurich?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Grasshopper Club Zurich, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Grasshopper Club Zurich: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Grasshopper Club Zurich still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Grasshopper Club Zurich still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is FC Bâle 1893 vs Grasshopper Club Zurich on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 52%.