Foresportia Elo
1610Brasileirão rank : 4th
Fluminense Football Club
Foresportia analyses Fluminense Football Club using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.56Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
0.98Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
1.80Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
48.9%Average over 10 predictions1. How Foresportia evaluates Fluminense Football Club
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Clube Atlético MineiroElo : 1573
Fluminense Football ClubElo : 1614
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Clube Atlético Mineiro 39%Draw 30%Fluminense Football Club 31%
3. Prediction reliability for Fluminense Football Club
Data updated on 06 September 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2024-05 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2024-06 | Risk | 60.0% | 10 |
| 2024-07 | Risk | 50.0% | 14 |
| 2024-08 | Risk | 50.0% | 18 |
| 2024-09 | Risk | 50.0% | 22 |
| 2024-10 | Risk | 42.3% | 26 |
| 2024-11 | Risk | 43.3% | 30 |
| 2024-12 | Risk | 40.6% | 32 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | 42.4% | 33 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 45.9% | 37 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 45.0% | 40 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 43.9% | 41 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 48.9% | 45 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 50.0% | 50 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 47.2% | 53 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 49.2% | 59 |
| 2025-11 | Risk | 50.0% | 64 |
| 2025-12 | Risk | 49.2% | 65 |
| 2026-01 | Risk | 49.2% | 65 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 50.7% | 67 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 50.7% | 69 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 51.4% | 72 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 50.7% | 75 |
| 2026-06 | Risk | 50.0% | 76 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 48.1% | 79 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 47.0% | 83 |
| 2024-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-11 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-12 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-11 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-12 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2026-01 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | 90.9% | 11 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | 92.3% | 13 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | 85.7% | 14 |
| 2026-06 | Correct and above | 85.7% | 14 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | 85.7% | 14 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | 85.7% | 14 |
| 2024-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-12 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-12 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-01 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2024-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-12 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-12 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-01 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for Fluminense Football Club
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance2.08 pts/matchHigher observed return
Away performance0.92 pts/matchLower observed return
5. Statistical markers for Fluminense Football Club
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 97 verified matches
6. Market signals for Fluminense Football Club
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Double chance 1X71.0%87.5%24Major, well-documented signal
Home win55.6%87.5%8Promising signal, limited sample
Both teams to score53.4%66.7%15Success above the average probability
Double chance X264.7%64.7%17Recurring signal
Double chance 1271.7%64.0%25Recurring signal
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Fluminense Football Club
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Fluminense Football Club
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Fluminense Football Club
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Fluminense Football Club
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Fluminense Football Club mainly shows a more productive attacking profile. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Fluminense Football Club shows a stronger attacking profile, scoring 1.80 goals per match recently.
The next detected match is Clube Atlético Mineiro vs Fluminense Football Club on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 39%.
AI verdictHigh predictive reliability
Correct and above: 85.7% success across 14 verified 1X2 predictions.
Verify the complete history →Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Fluminense Football Club FAQ
What is the next match for Fluminense Football Club on Foresportia?
This page shows Fluminense Football Club's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Fluminense Football Club's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Fluminense Football Club's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Fluminense Football Club?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Fluminense Football Club, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Fluminense Football Club: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Fluminense Football Club mainly shows a more productive attacking profile. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Fluminense Football Club shows a stronger attacking profile, scoring 1.80 goals per match recently.
The next detected match is Clube Atlético Mineiro vs Fluminense Football Club on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 39%.