Foresportia Elo
1511Super League rank : 7th
FC Bâle 1893
Foresportia analyses FC Bâle 1893 using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.56Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.20Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
0.60Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
48.4%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: FC Bâle 1893
FC Bâle 1893 are going through a difficult run, taking 3 points from the last five recorded matches in Super League. Their defense needs attention: 13 goals conceded against 7 scored. More matches this season are needed to confirm this trend.
Super League · 2026-2027 · 10 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| 0 | 3 | 0 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates FC Bâle 1893
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
FC Bâle 1893Elo : 1484
Grasshopper Club ZurichElo : 1397
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
FC Bâle 1893 52%Draw 27%Grasshopper Club Zurich 21%
3. Prediction reliability for FC Bâle 1893
Data updated on 21 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 63.6% | 11 |
| 2025-11 | Risk | 53.3% | 15 |
| 2025-12 | Risk | 52.6% | 19 |
| 2026-01 | Risk | 52.4% | 21 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 46.2% | 26 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 50.0% | 28 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 48.4% | 31 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 48.6% | 35 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 47.2% | 36 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 47.5% | 40 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 45.5% | 44 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 44.4% | 45 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-11 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-12 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-01 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-12 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-01 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-12 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-01 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for FC Bâle 1893
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.38 pts/matchComparable return
Away performance1.50 pts/matchComparable return
5. Statistical markers for FC Bâle 1893
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 48 verified matches
6. Market signals for FC Bâle 1893
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Double chance 1273.7%88.9%27Major, well-documented signal
Over 2.558.5%81.2%16Major, well-documented signal
Both teams to score59.9%64.7%17Recurring signal
Double chance 1X66.7%56.0%25Success below the average probability
Double chance X261.3%55.6%27Recurring signal
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
FC Bâle 1893
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
FC Bâle 1893
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
FC Bâle 1893
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
FC Bâle 1893
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, FC Bâle 1893 still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
FC Bâle 1893 still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is FC Bâle 1893 vs Grasshopper Club Zurich on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 52%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. FC Bâle 1893 FAQ
What is the next match for FC Bâle 1893 on Foresportia?
This page shows FC Bâle 1893's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read FC Bâle 1893's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for FC Bâle 1893's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for FC Bâle 1893?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for FC Bâle 1893, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
FC Bâle 1893: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, FC Bâle 1893 still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
FC Bâle 1893 still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is FC Bâle 1893 vs Grasshopper Club Zurich on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 52%.