Foresportia Elo
1689Allsvenskan rank : 2nd
Djurgårdens IF
Foresportia analyses Djurgårdens IF using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.52Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.20Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
2.40Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
49.6%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: Djurgårdens IF
Djurgårdens IF are enjoying a positive run, taking 12 points from the last five recorded matches in Allsvenskan. Their defense has held firm: 2 goals conceded against 7 goals scored.
Allsvenskan · 2026 · 24 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | 3 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates Djurgårdens IF
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Djurgårdens IFElo : 1703
Örgryte ISElo : 1423
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Djurgårdens IF 64%Draw 22%Örgryte IS 14%
3. Prediction reliability for Djurgårdens IF
Data updated on 21 October 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
63.6%| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 63.6% | 11 |
| 2025-06 | Risk | 53.8% | 13 |
| 2025-07 | Risk | 56.2% | 16 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 55.0% | 20 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 50.0% | 22 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 45.8% | 24 |
| 2025-11 | Risk | 46.2% | 26 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 50.0% | 30 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 50.0% | 32 |
| 2026-07 | Risk | 52.9% | 34 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 50.0% | 38 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 53.7% | 41 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 53.5% | 43 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-11 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 7 |
| 2026-07 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | 70.0% | 10 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | 63.6% | 11 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | 63.6% | 11 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-06 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-07 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for Djurgårdens IF
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.63 pts/matchLower observed return
Away performance1.93 pts/matchHigher observed return
5. Statistical markers for Djurgårdens IF
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 54 verified matches
6. Market signals for Djurgårdens IF
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Double chance 1271.4%92.0%25Major, well-documented signal
Away draw no bet64.6%81.8%11Success above the average probability
Double chance X266.9%75.0%20Major, well-documented signal
Away win56.5%60.0%5Promising signal, limited sample
Home win56.2%60.0%5Promising signal, limited sample
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Djurgårdens IF
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Djurgårdens IF
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Djurgårdens IF
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Djurgårdens IF
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Djurgårdens IF mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Djurgårdens IF is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.40 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of 1.09.
The next detected match is Djurgårdens IF vs Örgryte IS on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 64%.
AI verdictModerate predictive reliability
Correct and above: 63.6% success across 11 verified 1X2 predictions.
Verify the complete history →Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Djurgårdens IF FAQ
What is the next match for Djurgårdens IF on Foresportia?
This page shows Djurgårdens IF's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Djurgårdens IF's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Djurgårdens IF's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Djurgårdens IF?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Djurgårdens IF, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Djurgårdens IF: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Djurgårdens IF mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Djurgårdens IF is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.40 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of 1.09.
The next detected match is Djurgårdens IF vs Örgryte IS on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 64%.