Foresportia Elo
1416Ligue 2 rank : 14th
Clermont Foot 63
Foresportia analyses Clermont Foot 63 using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.55Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.20Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
1.60Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
52.2%Average over 10 predictions1. How Foresportia evaluates Clermont Foot 63
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Clermont Foot 63Elo : 1420
US BoulogneElo : 1410
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Clermont Foot 63 42%Draw 35%US Boulogne 23%
3. Prediction reliability for Clermont Foot 63
Data updated on 06 September 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2024-09 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2024-10 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2024-11 | Risk | 33.3% | 12 |
| 2024-12 | Risk | 35.7% | 14 |
| 2025-01 | Risk | 36.8% | 19 |
| 2025-02 | Risk | 31.8% | 22 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | 32.0% | 25 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 34.5% | 29 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 35.5% | 31 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 37.1% | 35 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 42.1% | 38 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 44.2% | 43 |
| 2025-11 | Risk | 43.2% | 44 |
| 2025-12 | Risk | 41.3% | 46 |
| 2026-01 | Risk | 42.9% | 49 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 39.6% | 53 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 41.1% | 56 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 40.0% | 60 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 38.7% | 62 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 39.1% | 64 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 38.5% | 65 |
| 2024-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-11 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2024-12 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-01 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-11 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2025-12 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-01 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2024-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-12 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-01 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-12 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-01 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-12 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-01 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-12 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-01 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
4. Predictive profile for Clermont Foot 63
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.11 pts/matchHigher observed return
Away performance0.92 pts/matchLower observed return
5. Statistical markers for Clermont Foot 63
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 71 verified matches
6. Market signals for Clermont Foot 63
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Double chance 1X67.8%68.4%19Confirmed signal
Double chance X262.6%68.4%19Confirmed signal
Double chance 1269.7%63.2%19Recurring signal
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Clermont Foot 63
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Clermont Foot 63
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Clermont Foot 63
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Clermont Foot 63
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Clermont Foot 63 still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Clermont Foot 63 still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is Clermont Foot 63 vs US Boulogne on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 42%.
Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Clermont Foot 63 FAQ
What is the next match for Clermont Foot 63 on Foresportia?
This page shows Clermont Foot 63's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Clermont Foot 63's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Clermont Foot 63's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Clermont Foot 63?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Clermont Foot 63, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Clermont Foot 63: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Clermont Foot 63 still requires a more cautious read tied to recent form and match context. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Clermont Foot 63 still needs to be read through recent form, Elo and its advanced production indicators.
The next detected match is Clermont Foot 63 vs US Boulogne on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Home win” around 42%.