Foresportia Elo
1684Premier League rank : 3rd
Brighton & Hove Albion
Foresportia analyses Brighton & Hove Albion using its match data and proprietary models: Elo level, recent form, probabilities, observed reliability and verifiable market signals.
1X2 entropy
1.53Lower = easier to readPoints volatility
1.20Standard deviation over 5 matchesRecent form
2.40Points per match over 5 matchesModel confidence
50.8%Average over 10 predictionsCurrent analysis: Brighton & Hove Albion
Brighton & Hove Albion are enjoying a positive run, taking 12 points from the last five recorded matches in Premier League. With 10 goals scored and 2 conceded, the team combine a productive attack with a solid defense over these matches. More matches this season are needed to confirm this trend.
Premier League · 2026-2027 · 9 matches analyzed
View analyzed match details
| Date | Goals scored | Goals conceded | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0 | 3 | |
| 5 | 0 | 3 | |
| 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | 3 |
1. How Foresportia evaluates Brighton & Hove Albion
Summary of indicators actually available in Foresportia data.
2. Next match
Hull CityElo : 1524
Brighton & Hove AlbionElo : 1665
1X2 probabilities (Foresportia model)
Hull City 30%Draw 31%Brighton & Hove Albion 38%
3. Prediction reliability for Brighton & Hove Albion
Data updated on 14 November 2026
Reliability trendCumulative monthly history
Insufficient sample| Cumulative monthly history | Profile | Reliability | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2024-09 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2024-10 | Risk | Insufficient sample | 9 |
| 2024-11 | Risk | 16.7% | 12 |
| 2024-12 | Risk | 16.7% | 18 |
| 2025-01 | Risk | 23.8% | 21 |
| 2025-02 | Risk | 33.3% | 24 |
| 2025-03 | Risk | 36.0% | 25 |
| 2025-04 | Risk | 40.0% | 30 |
| 2025-05 | Risk | 41.2% | 34 |
| 2025-08 | Risk | 43.2% | 37 |
| 2025-09 | Risk | 42.5% | 40 |
| 2025-10 | Risk | 41.9% | 43 |
| 2025-11 | Risk | 42.2% | 45 |
| 2025-12 | Risk | 38.8% | 49 |
| 2026-01 | Risk | 40.4% | 52 |
| 2026-02 | Risk | 40.0% | 55 |
| 2026-03 | Risk | 40.7% | 59 |
| 2026-04 | Risk | 40.3% | 62 |
| 2026-05 | Risk | 40.0% | 65 |
| 2026-08 | Risk | 41.8% | 67 |
| 2026-09 | Risk | 40.6% | 69 |
| 2026-10 | Risk | 42.5% | 73 |
| 2026-11 | Risk | 43.2% | 74 |
| 2024-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-11 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2024-12 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-01 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-02 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-03 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-04 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-05 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-08 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-09 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-10 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2025-11 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 6 |
| 2025-12 | Correct and above | Insufficient sample | 8 |
| 2026-01 | Correct and above | 70.0% | 10 |
| 2026-02 | Correct and above | 70.0% | 10 |
| 2026-03 | Correct and above | 70.0% | 10 |
| 2026-04 | Correct and above | 70.0% | 10 |
| 2026-05 | Correct and above | 72.7% | 11 |
| 2026-08 | Correct and above | 72.7% | 11 |
| 2026-09 | Correct and above | 72.7% | 11 |
| 2026-10 | Correct and above | 72.7% | 11 |
| 2026-11 | Correct and above | 72.7% | 11 |
| 2024-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-12 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-01 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2025-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2025-12 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 4 |
| 2026-01 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-02 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-03 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-04 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-05 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-08 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-09 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-10 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2026-11 | Stable and above | Insufficient sample | 5 |
| 2024-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2024-12 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-01 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 0 |
| 2025-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 1 |
| 2025-12 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 2 |
| 2026-01 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-02 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-03 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-04 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-05 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-08 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-09 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-10 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 3 |
| 2026-11 | Ultra stable | Insufficient sample | 3 |
4. Predictive profile for Brighton & Hove Albion
ContextObserved measureReading
Home performance1.81 pts/matchHigher observed return
Away performance1.31 pts/matchLower observed return
5. Statistical markers for Brighton & Hove Albion
Team values from Foresportia sources, without a reconstructed league average.
History: 85 verified matches
6. Market signals for Brighton & Hove Albion
MarketAverage probabilityReliabilityVolumeReading
Double chance 1271.6%88.0%25Major, well-documented signal
Double chance 1X68.4%68.2%22Confirmed signal
Under 2.570.3%83.3%6Promising signal, limited sample
Over 2.553.1%57.9%19Recurring signal
Home draw no bet61.1%56.2%16Recurring signal
7. Model dynamics & analysis
Foresportia Elo trendTracks the team’s relative level as matches are played.
Brighton & Hove Albion
Average model confidenceShows how the model’s average certainty changes across matches.
Brighton & Hove Albion
xG differential trendCompares expected goals created and conceded to track the balance of chances.
PositiveNegative
Model calibrationCompares published probabilities with the rates actually observed.
Observed ratePerfect
League-position trendTracks the team’s league position throughout the season.
Brighton & Hove Albion
Goals scored / concededCompares goals scored and conceded using a five-match rolling average.
Goals scored / match (5)Goals conceded / match (5)
Points per matchTracks points earned per match using a five-match rolling average.
Brighton & Hove Albion
8. Foresportia analysis
For Foresportia, Brighton & Hove Albion mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Brighton & Hove Albion is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.40 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of 0.97.
The next detected match is Hull City vs Brighton & Hove Albion on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 38%.
AI verdictStrong predictive reliability
Correct and above: 72.7% success across 11 verified 1X2 predictions.
Verify the complete history →Continue exploring
Upcoming matches, competition, other teams and verifiable history.
9. Brighton & Hove Albion FAQ
What is the next match for Brighton & Hove Albion on Foresportia?
This page shows Brighton & Hove Albion's confirmed next match with the enriched prediction probabilities that are currently available.
How should you read Brighton & Hove Albion's ranking and Elo?
This page includes dedicated charts for Brighton & Hove Albion's ranking and Elo trends, with season separators to make the evolution easier to read.
What does the strongest picks block mean for Brighton & Hove Albion?
It highlights the markets that performed best in the available history for Brighton & Hove Albion, together with sample size, hit rate and average probability.
Brighton & Hove Albion: AI analysis, predictions and Foresportia signals
For Foresportia, Brighton & Hove Albion mainly combines stronger recent control and a more reliable defensive base. This page also tracks ranking, Elo evolution, goal trends and the market signals Foresportia finds most useful.
Brighton & Hove Albion is going through a strong control sequence, with 2.40 points per match over the last five matches and an average xG delta of 0.97.
The next detected match is Hull City vs Brighton & Hove Albion on . The leading 1X2 read currently points to “Away win” around 38%.