Prediction for Celtic vs Aberdeen
CelticWWWWW
AberdeenLWLLWForesportia's analysis estimates that Celtic has the advantage based on the 1X2 probabilities. The models give Celtic a clear edge in the 1X2 reading. The more protective signal remains double chance 1X at 91.1%, rather than the straight 1X2 pick. Confidence reflects how clear the signal is for this match; stability reflects its historical robustness.
Why the model sees it this way
Probabilities & verdict
Main pickCeltic
1X2 STABILITYUltra stable
Model confidence82%
1X2 alternatives
How the match could unfold
Expected goals (xG)2.19Celtic
Total xG2.89
Expected goals (xG)0.70Aberdeen
Under 2.5 probability41.5%
BTTS No probability50.4%
Advanced scenarios
Team comparison
Prediction reliability
The signal belongs to the historically most stable profile, while remaining probabilistic.
100% correct predictions
over 3 verified matches
Quick FAQ
What is the prediction for Celtic vs Aberdeen?
The Foresportia model gives Celtic a clear edge at 70.7%. This estimate does not guarantee the final result.
What is the likely score?
The model's first score scenario is 2 - 1 (12.66%). An exact score remains one scenario among several.
Is BTTS likely?
The model estimates BTTS Yes at 49.6% and BTTS No at 50.4%.
Which market is the most cautious according to the model?
Double chance 1X stands at 91.1%, without being certain.
Explore more on Foresportia
Our commitment
◇ Predictions archived before kick-off
◇ No invented data
What the data says about Celtic vs Aberdeen
This Premiership fixture is presented using the competition calendar, the available standings and the teams' recent form.
Before kick-off, Celtic sits 1st and Aberdeen 8th in the table. Their Elo ratings are 1709 for Celtic and 1430 for Aberdeen.
Across the five latest available matches, the form index is 100% for Celtic and 40% for Aberdeen. It measures recent momentum but does not decide the result on its own.
According to probabilities calculated by Foresportia, the 1X2 projection gives Celtic 70.7%, the draw 20.4% and Aberdeen 8.9%. The expected-goals model projects 2.19 xG against 0.70, for a combined 2.89. The most likely score according to Foresportia is 2–1 at 12.7%.